Photo of Kirk Jenkins

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with trial teams to ensure that important issues are properly presented and preserved for appellate review.  Mr. Jenkins is a pioneer in the application of data analytics to appellate decision-making and writes two analytics blogs, the California Supreme Court Review and the Illinois Supreme Court Review, as well as regularly writing for various legal publications.

11428980715_2ce4ce91e3_z

Today, we begin our analysis of a new subject – tracking the California Supreme Court’s experience with amicus curiae briefs.  The Court more closely tracks the experience of the United States Supreme Court than of other state Supreme Courts (including the Illinois Supreme Court, as reported in our Illinois Supreme Court Review) in its

4337187600_ed662054af_z

Yesterday, we demonstrated that majority opinions have been getting somewhat longer on average in criminal cases at the California Supreme Court since 2007.  Today, we turn our attention to the Court’s majority opinions in automatic death penalty appeals.  These two inquiries are not entirely independent; yesterday we were working with overall criminal docket data, including

174259121_7ca333df2b_z (1)

Last week, we began our analysis of the length of the Court’s majority opinions, addressing civil and criminal cases between 2000 and 2007.  Yesterday, we reviewed the Court’s majority opinions in death penalty appeals for the same period.  Today, we turn our attention to majority opinions in civil cases between 2008 and 2015.

Overall, there

12741168783_170d1746a5_z

Last week, we began addressing trends in the length of the Court’s majority opinions, reviewing civil and criminal majority opinions between 2000 and 2007.  Today, we turn our attention to the Court’s majority opinions in automatic death penalty appeals, with the data divided between non-unanimous and unanimous opinions.

As we show in Table 114 below,

1700161761_2f9ad1d30a_z

Yesterday, we began our review of the length of the California Supreme Court’s majority opinions, addressing the Court’s civil opinions between 2000 and 2007.  Today, we turn our attention to the Court’s majority opinions in criminal cases during the same period.

We report the data in Table 113 below.  Two things are evident: first, majority

218926074_4a124aca76_z

Last week, we completed our examination of reversal rates and average votes to affirm, District by District of the Court of Appeal.  This week, we turn our attention to another issue: the length of the Court’s opinions.  For context, the average majority opinion from the Illinois Supreme Court, the other court we closely follow, averages

6200072018_3bfbdea2df_z

Last week, we began another phase of our analysis of the standing of the Courts of Appeal in the California Supreme Court’s decision making, calculating three-year floating average votes to affirm each District of the Court of Appeal in civil and criminal cases.  Today, we begin the second half of that analysis with the civil