1700161761_2f9ad1d30a_z (1)

Yesterday, we analyzed the lag times – from grant of review to oral argument, and oral argument to decision – in the Court’s civil docket from 2008 to 2016.  Today, we’ll address the data for the criminal docket.  One definition – for cases such as the death penalty docket where there is no grant of

4051238391_636a4c5ce1_z

Last week, we began addressing the issue of the average lag time from grant of review to oral argument and from argument to decision, analyzing the data for the civil and criminal dockets from 2000 to 2007.  This week, we’ll address the data for 2008 through 2016, beginning today with the civil docket.

There is

14162069538_aba7d2f8c1_z

Yesterday, we analyzed the average lag time from grant of review to oral argument, and oral argument to decision, in civil cases between 2000 and 2007.  Today, we turn our attention to the Court’s criminal docket for the same years.

For the entire period, the average lag time from grant of review to oral argument

3988362967_158ed3bd1a_z

This week, we begin a new phase of our analysis: how long does the average case remain pending at the California Supreme Court from grant of review to oral argument to decision, and what are the differences between civil, criminal and death penalty cases?

In Table 167 below, we report the mean number of days,

14982426134_0dce580207_z

For the past few weeks, we’ve been taking a close look at the California Supreme Court’s automatic death penalty appeals docket.  Yesterday, we calculated the average time from appointment of counsel to the scheduled oral argument and looked at whether the total time under submission told us anything about what the ultimate result would be. 

7670456164_0d86767074_z

Last week, we continued our analysis of the California Supreme Court’s death penalty docket, tracing the number of cases which the Court decides every year, the fraction of the docket that’s decided unanimously, and the frequency with which the Court reverses in part or outright. Today we turn our attention to a controversial topic: how